
McGinn Penalty Denied: Referee Cites Ball Going Out of Play
Key points
- ▪Referee Tantashev denied McGinn penalty, citing ball trajectory.
- ▪Scotland midfielder's brother Stephen revealed the explanation.
- ▪Decision raises questions about VAR and officiating standards.
A controversial moment in international football has sparked debate after referee Ilgiz Tantashev explained his decision to deny Scotland midfielder John McGinn a penalty against Morocco. The explanation, relayed by McGinn's brother Stephen, was that the ball was going out of play before any foul could be considered.
What happened
During a recent international fixture between Scotland and Morocco, John McGinn went down in the box, appealing for a penalty. The referee, Ilgiz Tantashev, waved play on without consulting the video assistant referee. After the match, McGinn's brother Stephen revealed that Tantashev had told the midfielder the reason for the denial: the ball was already heading out of play, negating any potential advantage or foul. This rare insight into in-game reasoning sets the incident apart from typical refereeing controversies.
Why it matters
This incident highlights the fine margins in modern football. Referees are increasingly applying the principle that if the ball is going out, incidents in the buildup may be overlooked. For Scotland, a penalty could have changed the outcome of the match, especially with McGinn being their creative spark in midfield. The decision also raises questions about the use of VAR, which could have reviewed the incident had the referee been uncertain. Since Tantashev was confident in his call, no formal review took place, a choice that may fuel debate about when VAR should step in.
What it means going forward
With international football continuing to emphasize fast and fair decisions, this kind of explanation from a referee is rare but illuminating. It shows that officials are considering the overall context of the play, not just isolated fouls. For Scotland, it's a reminder that they need to be decisive in the box, as not every challenge will be given. As the team looks ahead to upcoming qualifiers and tournaments, they will hope for more favorable calls. Ultimately, the incident underscores how a single decision—even with a clear rationale—can leave players and fans feeling shortchanged.
More from OffsidePost
Pulisic Tops Americans Abroad Watchability Tier List: Who Else Makes the Cut?
Lommel SK vs Club Brugge: Stats to Shape a September Showdown
Desirée Cordero: A New TV Chapter Away from the Ronaldo Spotlight
CAF Backs Infantino After Proposal Withdrawn, Hails 2026 World Cup
Roy Keane and Micah Richards go time-travelling in new Sky Bet ad

Norrie reignites Indian Wells form to shock De Minaur in Montreal